Search selected Indian judgments by court, citation, or keyword. This beta collection has limited coverage; verify the official record.
Search a curated set of landmark judgments by keyword and filter by court.
This local beta collection currently contains selected Supreme Court judgments only. High Court, tribunal and broader research requires external official portals. Always verify against the primary source.
For broader or authoritative searches, use the official court and government portals.
Official document identified · case title matched 2026-10-18. Claim support and subsequent treatment not reviewed.
A 7-judge bench held that the 'procedure established by law' under Article 21 must be fair, just and reasonable and not arbitrary. Established the golden triangle of Articles 14, 19 and 21 — any law depriving personal liberty must satisfy all three.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (Right to Privacy)
(2017) 10 SCC 1
Official document identified · case title matched 2026-10-18. Claim support and subsequent treatment not reviewed.
A 9-judge bench unanimously held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right protected under Article 21 and other provisions of Part III. Any invasion must satisfy legality, necessity and proportionality.
Official document identified · case title matched 2026-10-18. Claim support and subsequent treatment not reviewed.
Laid down guidelines against sexual harassment of women at the workplace, later codified in the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
Official document identified · case title matched 2026-10-18. Claim support and subsequent treatment not reviewed.
The 2013 Constitution Bench decision addresses registration of an FIR under the former CrPC Section 154 and the limited purpose of a preliminary inquiry. Its original seven-day inquiry direction was modified by the Supreme Court's order of 5 March 2014 to fifteen days generally and, with adequate recorded reasons in exceptional cases, six weeks. This is a historical CrPC decision, not a statement of the current BNSS procedure; check the applicable Act, date and current judgments separately.
Exact judgment document not checked · do not treat this summary as verified authority.
Directed police not to automatically arrest under IPC Section 498A (now BNS Section 85) and similar offences punishable with up to 7 years. A checklist under Section 41 CrPC (now BNSS 35) must be recorded. Magistrates must not authorise detention casually.
Official document identified · case title matched 2026-10-18. Claim support and subsequent treatment not reviewed.
Struck down Section 66A of the IT Act as unconstitutionally vague and violative of Article 19(1)(a). Read down Section 79 intermediary safe harbour and clarified Section 69A blocking rules.
Official document identified · case title matched 2026-10-18. Claim support and subsequent treatment not reviewed.
Decriminalised consensual same-sex conduct between adults by reading down Section 377 IPC. Grounded in Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 and the Puttaswamy privacy judgment.
Exact judgment document not checked · do not treat this summary as verified authority.
Held that freedom of speech and to carry on business through the internet is protected under Article 19. Any restriction (including internet shutdowns) must satisfy proportionality, be published, and be subject to periodic review.
Official document identified · case title matched 2026-10-18. Claim support and subsequent treatment not reviewed.
Held that involuntary administration of narco-analysis, polygraph and brain-mapping tests violates the right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) and the right to privacy under Article 21. Consent must be voluntary and informed.
Exact judgment document not checked · do not treat this summary as verified authority.
Directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate to function fairly and impartially in corruption cases. Laid down guidelines for the appointment of an independent Central Vigilance Commissioner and the autonomy of investigating agencies.
Exact judgment document not checked · do not treat this summary as verified authority.
Applied the rule of absolute liability for hazardous industries under Article 21 and Article 32. A person carrying on a hazardous activity owes an absolute and non-delegable duty to ensure that no harm results to anyone.
Exact judgment document not checked · do not treat this summary as verified authority.
Upheld the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution. Parliament can amend the Constitution but cannot alter its basic features such as judicial review, democracy, secularism and the rule of law.
This beta collection contains selected Supreme Court judgments. Wider High Court, tribunal and other searches use the linked official portals. It is not a complete Indian case-law database or a guaranteed current-law digest.
What should I check before citing a judgment?
Match the case title, court, date, citation, relevant paragraph and the issue actually decided. Read the official document and check later treatment separately; a short summary is not the judgment.
What if I cannot find the case?
Try the exact citation, a distinctive party name and alternative spellings, then use the relevant official court portal. A missing search result is a coverage limitation, not evidence that the decision does not exist.
This is general legal information, not legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific situation.